Experiment 626. Twenty-five. "She" (technically cis-female but really gender-queer). Part of the invisible/forgotten B in LGBTQ. Aquarius. Fat and beautiful. Professionally involved in psychology and mental health. Feminist, activist, and advocate (which should go without saying, for everyone). Television show enthusiast. Obsessed with the 53 Disney Animated Features. ASOIAF reader. Ravenclaw.

All of my posts are queued and then randomized.

I run a Disney tumblr called disneyanalysis.

 

trashprincesss:

freckledtrekkie:

the worst kind of misogyny

is the kind that seeps out of your uncle’s mouth at christmas dinner

or from your favorite movie you’ve watched 500 times

or that snide comment your cousin makes on vacation

from the people you trust

and so quick

so slickly spoken

you barely catch it 

its the betrayal that gets ya

Nerdy Feminist: Dear AMC's The Walking Dead...Stop It

Seriously—knock it off. Whatever it is you are trying to do with the gender situation in season two, cut it out. It’s not working, and it’s pretty offensive.

(Spoilers to follow)

The main crew

Let me back up. So, my friend Danee has been working on a piece about the feminism of AMC’s The Walking Dead, mostly season 1. It was really fun watching it with her while considering this perspective, and getting to see the finished piece she came up with. Overall, it gave me a perspective about season one that was mixed.

Basically, the feeling I got was that the characters were struggling to figure out how gender would play out in their new world—one which is very different from our current culture, but is composed of people who were members of our society, and therefore bring with them all the notions of patriarchy that each of us carry on a daily basis. Tasks like defending the group from “walkers,” hunting, and leading were left primarily to men, while women took on traditionally feminine roles like cooking, childcare, and foraging. However, as Danee detailed in her piece, there were challenges to the traditional gender structure. It was interesting, complex, and worth analysis.

(Side note: Danee, if you have an electronic version of your article any time soon, I’d like to link to it here.)

Then came Season 2. I honestly feel like the writers this season showed up to work the first day and said, “FUCK IT, let’s make all the women somewhat foolish/childish/needy and the men strong leaders. DONE.”

I will give you a few examples:

1) Andrea shoots Daryl— You see, in the episode “Chupacabra,” Daryl had ventured into the woods to look for a lost girl on his own. He is significantly injured and comes trudging back to the camp looking a bit like a walker. From a distance, Andrea spies him with her rifle scope and decides to take a shot. Protecting the group might sound like a smart, progressive thing for a female character to do and it would be IF: a) everyone hadn’t already been taught a million times that gunshots are dangerous as they attract walkers. b) there wasn’t a group of men already approaching Daryl with hand weapons who had CLEARLY stopped short staring at what was happening and figuring out it was him. Wouldn’t she wonder why they weren’t attacking? But no, she acts foolishly and impulsively and shoots Daryl. But don’t worry guys! She’s such a mess up that she doesn’t even fully strike her target, she only grazes his head. Daryl will be just fine despite tha crazee womern! Now I know some people will argue that the character of Andrea is actually getting stronger simply because she’s been wielding a gun more—but let me put it like this, you can put a gun a woman’s hands and that does not make a strong character. The summation of her actions make or do not make a strong character. Besides, keep reading and tell me that the gender situation in this season isn’t grim.

Andrea learning to shoot from Shane


2) Carol’s incessant crying/helplessness—Carol is the mother of the missing girl, Sophia. Sophia’s disappearance has been a major plot point this season (which, frankly, is getting old. She’s been gone too long. Get over it, move on.) That aside, instead of doing anything about it and helping to look for her, Carol is just pretty much crying and wringing her hands constantly. And blaming Sophia’s disappearance on Rick, the group’s leader. I get that Carol is an abuse survivor which comes with a multitude of emotional scars. However, when they killed off her abusive husband, Ed, mid first season, it looked like they were creating a turning point for her. When the camp is attacked and Ed is bitten, the survivors have to smash the heads of the dead/bitten people so that they don’t reawaken as walkers. Carol takes on the task of smashing Ed’s brains out and strikes his corpse over and over again out of pain and anger. At that moment, I thought I might be able to expect something interesting. Carol would no longer be constrained by Ed. What would she have to say and what could she do without him watching her every move? The answer is apparently simple: not a whole lot. Sure, it would be horrifically traumatic to lose your daughter in the woods any time, let alone during a zombie apocalypse. But a strong female character would DO something about it. Not sit around lamenting and running up to the search team episode after episode saying things like, “Any sign?”

3) Maggie’s mixed signals—Because so many of the original crew from season one has become zombie food or decided to blow themselves up at the CDC, the writers had to introduce a whole new group of characters, and they did so by having the main crew stumble upon a farm house, owned by Hershel. Hershel’s farm and family provide the crew with many things they needed: medical supplies, food, water, clothing, horses, and most importantly, safety. The farm group also serve as an important plot device: potential new love stories. One such story emerges between Glenn, from the original crew, and Maggie, Hershel’s daughter. Maggie was a beacon of hope for me for a moment. Could it be? A bad ass chick who rides in on a horse, chops walkers, and leads others to safety? But of course, Maggie’s characterization couldn’t keep up the hopes I had. In her relationship with Glenn she falls into the stereotype of the woman who sends mixed signals and doesn’t know what she wants. I really don’t expect any female character to be perfect. I can accept that Maggie is overly emotional in interactions with various characters and that she has to be rescued in one excursion into town with Glenn—but can’t she at least stay clear headed and decisive about their relationship?

4) Men are in charge of everything significant—Everything around the camp that matters is in the hands of one of the male characters. Rick and Hershel are the leaders of their respective groups. When it becomes clear that Hershel doesn’t want the farm group and the main crew to become too entwined with one another, he tells Rick to get “his people” in order. This interaction clears up any doubt for us at the audience: men are running the show. All real challenges to authority come from other men. Even when Maggie challenges authority, she doesn’t do so on her own behalf. Rather, she questions why Glenn isn’t more powerful amongst the core group. Plus, everything that needs to be learned comes from men. Need to learn to shoot? Shane’s here for that! Need to learn to hunt or track? Daryl’s your man. Learning mechanics? Talk to Dale. Need medical care? Hershel’s here! Women are, again and again, positioned as assistants and learners while men are the gatekeepers of all “important” knowledge.

Lori

5) Lori’s Plan B/Abortion Pill stuff—In the most recent episode, “Secrets” Lori didn’t know the difference between Plan B and the abortion pill. This is what really was my inspiration to write this whole thing and the straw that broke the metaphorical camel’s back. However, my issues with Lori runs much deeper than this. Lori, much like Carol but to a lesser degree, is constantly inactive. She is someone who had risen to become a female leader in her own right, but when push comes to shove she instantly defers to the judgement of various men like her husband Rick or her former lover, Shane. For example, when decisions must be made about her son Carl, she lets Rick make the final call.

However, the worst moment definitely was last night, when Lori was not only stupid, but delivered a dangerous message. You see, we’ve known Lori is pregnant for a few episodes, and had a positive pregnancy test, which means she’s at least a few weeks along. So in a panic, she asks Glenn to bring her something from town. When Glenn and Maggie return, we finally learn what it was Lori needed as Maggie throws packages that are clearly marked with ”the morning after pill” and says, “Here are your abortion pills!” Um, what? Ok, Maggie might not understand what they are, but it becomes pretty clear that at least a total of 4 characters on the show don’t know the difference too—and Lori’s the worst. Glenn asks her, “Will these even work?” to which she says, “I don’t know.” But later, in privacy, instead of reading the damn package to get the answer Lori ingests a HANDFUL of Plan B (but don’t worry guys, she pukes it up later. Baby saved. Huzzah!)

Wut.

Seriously? I mean, REALLY? This scene only serves to further misconceptions about EC, which for the last damn time, is NOT THE SAME AS THE ABORTION PILL. And make no mistake, this whole medicine mix up adds literally nothing to the story. They could have just as easily had Lori actually request abortions pills, be given abortion pills, take abortion pills, puke abortion pills, and it would have had the same affect on the story, but without furthering the myth that the morning after pill ends an existing pregnancy. Basically, the writers are either really lazy, want Lori to look like an utter moron, or are revealing their own pathetic ignorance about emergency contraception.

Sigh.

Look, I don’t expect gender situations to be perfect, but they could at least be a little more nuanced than how season two is shaping up. In a show like The Walking Dead, they have a unique opportunity to reimagine the world, and to reimagine it in a way which is not actually less gender progressive than the world in which I currently operate. I mean, come on. I don’t ask a lot. Anything would be better than this!



Disclaimer: My comments are limited solely to the AMC Walking Dead version, as I know nothing about the comics except that they’re not much like the show.

youngbadmanbrown:

“These incidents may appear small, banal and trivial, but we’re beginning to find they assail the mental health of recipients.” 

-Sue et. al , 2007


If white people would even admit any of the stuff on this list was racist my life would be easier. 

http://www.olc.edu/~jolson/socialwork/OnlineLibrary/microaggression%20article.pdf

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/02/microaggression.aspx

(Source: youngbadmangone)